The Black Forest

1719. Submitted on 2006/8/7, 16.07 h by Arduenn:

Ouwe lul

Nee, niet u. Niet ik. Niet opa Buiswater. Het heelal. 15,8 miljard i.p.v. 14,3 miljard jaar.

There are 5 comments to this post (the latest by Arduenn on 2006/8/7, 19.15 h).

1. Arduenn commented on 2006/8/7, 16.09 h:

Oeps. Ge-/.. Dan maar zo:

This article generated quite a few e-mails from readers who were perplexed or flat out could not believe the universe was just 13.7 billion years old yet 158 billion light-years wide. That suggests the speed of light has been exceeded, they argue. So SPACE.com asked Neil Cornish to explain further. Here is his response:

"The problem is that funny things happen in general relativity which appear to violate special relativity (nothing traveling faster than the speed of light and all that).

"Let's go back to Hubble's observation that distant galaxies appear to be moving away from us, and the more distant the galaxy, the faster it appears to move away. The constant of proportionality in that relationship is known as Hubble's constant.

"One seemingly paradoxical consequence of Hubble's observation is that galaxies sufficiently far away will be receding from us at a velocity faster than the speed of light. This distance is called the Hubble radius, and is commonly referred to as the horizon in analogy with a black hole horizon.

"In terms of special relativity, Hubble's law appears to be a paradox. But in general relativity we interpret the apparent recession as being due to space expanding (the old raisins in a rising fruit loaf analogy). The galaxies themselves are not moving through space (at least not very much), but the space itself is growing so they appear to be moving apart. There is nothing in special or general relativity to prevent this apparent velocity from exceeding the speed of light. No faster-than-light signals can be sent via this mechanism, and it does not lead to any paradoxes.

"Indeed, the WMAP data [on cosmic microwave background radiation] contain strong evidence that the very early universe underwent a period of accelerated expansion in which the distance been two points increased so quickly that light could not outrace the expansion so there was a true horizon -- in precise analogy with a black hole horizon. Indeed, the fluctuations we see in the CMB are thought to be generated by a process that is closely analogous to Hawking radiation from black holes.

"Even more amazing is the picture that emerges when you combine the WMAP data with [supernova] observations, which imply that the universe has started inflating again. If this is true, we have started to move away from the distant galaxies at a rate that is increasing, and in the future we will not be able to see as many galaxies as they will appear to be moving away from us faster than the speed of light (due to the expansion of space), so their light will not be able to reach us."

2. Dave commented on 2006/8/7, 17.12 h:

Maar wel groter dan verwacht, en overeind.

3. Arduenn commented on 2006/8/7, 17.33 h:

180.000.000 lichtjaar lang! Allemachtig!

4. bvdbos commented on 2006/8/7, 19.12 h:

ehmm, boswachter, bij deze: 0 + 0 + 0 extragratis om bij postjes te gebruiken.

5. Arduenn commented on 2006/8/7, 19.15 h:

180.000.000.0+0+0! Ng allemachtiger!

[image]

Allememachies!

Add new comment:

Name:

Site: